Surviving stomach bugs in UK ethnic groups: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The exposure patterns across ethnic groups are unclear for stomach bugs that cause self-limiting symptoms, significantly burdening UK health-care services and the economy. This study seeks to fill this gap by exploring how inequalities arise in managing stomach bugs in UK ethnic groups. METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was undertaken. Ethics approval was given by the University of Liverpool, and data were collected by IZ over 11 months from July 26, 2022, and May 26, 2023. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a general UK population sample (excluding health-care professionals) who were adults, partners, and parents, from an ethnic minority group, with recent diarrhoea, vomiting, or a stomach bug over the past 6 months. Recruitment was conducted through community gatekeepers using flyers. Participants were interviewed in person or virtually and gave written informed consent. An incentive of an Amazon voucher of £10 was imbursed to participants for their time. Interviews were audio-recorded using a password-protected digital recorder, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: 36 interviews (median age 31·5 years) were conducted with 11 women of Pakistani (n=6), Bangladeshi (n=2), Indian (n=2) and Arab ethnicity (n=1), and 25 men of Black (n=22), Pakistani (n=2), and Indian (n=1) ethnicity. This sample enabled an exploration of within-ethnic group experiences of stomach bugs in participants who self-defined their age, sex, and ethnicity. Themes such as managing food preparation (n=16), travel abroad (n=17), and personal cleanliness (n=3) were consistently reported across transcripts. The findings corroborate existing literature that there are more similarities than divergences in the management of stomach bugs across ethnic groups, such as the burden of care disproportionately affecting women and using over-the-counter medication to manage symptoms. INTERPRETATION: We do not know if the impact of these experiences across ethnic groups is entirely representative of the broader ethnic categories (ie, Asian vs Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi) they belong to or if there are inequalities in their impact on ethnic groups living in different circumstances (ie, UK born vs migrant). FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

Health inequalities in infectious diseases: a systematic overview of reviews.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic overview of reviews was to synthesise available evidence on inequalities in infectious disease based on three dimensions of inequalities; inclusion health groups, protected characteristics and socioeconomic inequalities. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and OpenGrey databases in November 2021. We included reviews published from the year 2000 which examined inequalities in the incidence, prevalence or consequences of infectious diseases based on the dimensions of interest. Our search focused on tuberculosis, HIV, sexually transmitted infections, hepatitis C, vaccination and antimicrobial resistance. However, we also included eligible reviews of any other infectious diseases. We appraised the quality of reviews using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews V.2 (AMSTAR2) checklist. We conducted a narrative data synthesis. RESULTS: We included 108 reviews in our synthesis covering all the dimensions of inequalities for most of the infectious disease topics of interest, however the quality and volume of review evidence and consistency of their findings varied. The existing literature reviews provide strong evidence that people in inclusion health groups and lower socioeconomic status are consistently at higher risk of infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance and incomplete/delayed vaccination. In the protected characteristics dimension, ethnicity, and sexual orientation are important factors contributing to inequalities across the various infectious disease topics included in this overview of reviews. CONCLUSION: We identified many reviews that provide evidence of various types of health inequalities in different infectious diseases, vaccination, and antimicrobial resistance. We also highlight areas where reviews may be lacking. The commonalities in the associations and their directions suggest it might be worth targeting interventions for some high risk-groups that may have benefits across multiple infectious disease outcomes rather than operating purely in infectious disease siloes.